Web Browsers

i do prefer working with older opera versions. I think that the included mail program makes opera browswers more vulnerable or more
in danger for viruses as far as i can say or talk about this or heard so far.
the Advantage of Opera is for me that it offers the best overview about all functions, e.g. History window and other details.
Anyway I think the newest versions include too much alternatives that might again lead to an increasing vulnerability of the software.
Also it is a fact that the included java components do not work with windows 95, which according to my pratice never made as much problems as e.g.
Win98.
What i want to say is : here i added a link to a list of operas file names and if searching for those filenames with a searchengine one might find download locations.

http://home.no.net/polynar/opera/old/
One very simple design to make working with any browser capacities better
lies within the bookmark folders, why is it not been programmed so far that the user is able to choose the colour of the folder, to get an easy basic systematic....

I set up an old 386 DX 40 for internet for a friends first computer, with DOS and win 3.1, I had heard about the Opera browser, and put versions 2.12 and 3.86 on it, and I was very impressed, I was able to surf the web quite well, I now have the newest version 7.54 on my win98 machine and feel quite good about it, a couple of months ago my IE 6 browser was 'hijacked' by a website virus and it took the better part of a day to undo the damage. I got the non java version of opera, so I don't have to worry about corruptive websites, activeX and all the dangers that target IE

Farshad

To upload (or ‘publish’) your site you need two things: webspace, and an FTP program. So look at the forum for FTP clients instead.